New Run2 simulation GT for HCal.

[diguida]

New Global Tags for Run2 simulations (ideal, startup, asymptotic) with the following change:

• updating HCal response corrections restoring the energy scale in HB and HE after introduction of TimeSlew simulation (DIGI) + Method 2 (RECO).

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @diguida (Salvatore Di Guida) for CMSSW_7_3_X.

New Run2 simulation GT for HCal.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/AlCa

@diguida, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @rcastello, @mmusich can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[slava77]

Why only run2?
We have the same HCAL reco in all eras (run1 and run2)

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 5c65b6c
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6642/1200/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6642/1200/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_3_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @ktf, @smuzaffar

[diguida]

@davidlange6
I assume you are referring to Run2 MC (given that the Run1 MC BeamSpot is untouched since at least one year). As you can see here e.g. for Run2 asymptotic scenario, we are still using the old BeamSpot, i.e. as checked for CSA14.
The new BeamSpot was supposed to come only in 74X (and actually it was reverted).

[davidlange6]

ah - indeed, I'm confusing 73 and 74.. Great.

On Dec 9, 2014, at 4:24 PM, Salvatore Di Guida notifications@github.com
wrote:

@davidlange6
I assume you are referring to Run2 MC (given that the Run1 MC BeamSpot is untouched since at least one year). As you can see here e.g. for Run2 asymptotic scenario, we are still using the old BeamSpot, i.e. as determined for CSA14.
The new BeamSpot was supposed to come only in 74X (and actually it was reverted).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[diguida]

@davidlange6 @slava77 @abdoulline
I assume that you want this change for Run1 MC to be forward-ported to 74X too...

[davidlange6]

Yes - definitely.

On Dec 9, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Salvatore Di Guida notifications@github.com
wrote:

@davidlange6 @slava77 @abdoulline
I assume that you want this change for Run1 MC to be forward-ported to 74X too...

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[diguida]

Ok, preparing a PR also there, stay tuned.

[diguida]

74X forward port in #6846

[davidlange6]

+1