Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrating PhysicsObjectsMonitor to new DQM API #7049

Merged

Conversation

vanbesien
Copy link
Contributor

Migrating PhysicsObjectsMonitor to new DQM API

For this package, it was only one module:
DQM/PhysicsObjectsMonitoring/interface/PhysicsObjectsMonitor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 6, 2015

A new Pull Request was created by @vanbesien (Broen van Besien) for CMSSW_7_4_X.

Migrating PhysicsObjectsMonitor to new DQM API

It involves the following packages:

DQM/PhysicsObjectsMonitoring

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @nclopezo, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 6, 2015

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 6, 2015

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Jan 12, 2015

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2015
Migrating PhysicsObjectsMonitor to new DQM API
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 8b905f4 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_4_X Jan 12, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants