New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use of pf-based b-taggers in DQM #7507
Conversation
…l read Run1 standard taggers for the moment.
A new Pull Request was created by @acaudron for CMSSW_7_4_X. Use of pf-based b-taggers in DQM It involves the following packages: DQMOffline/RecoB @cmsbuild, @danduggan, @nclopezo, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
…tor pf-based vs track only taggers.
FastSim issue was related to: https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/famos/631.html |
Pull request #7507 was updated. @cmsbuild, @danduggan, @nclopezo, @deguio can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
Use of pf-based b-taggers in DQM
Switch to pf-based taggers in the b-tagging DQM for fullsim and data as it will be default for Run2.
It's also making possible the reading of the b-tagging information from MiniAOD as only pf-based taggers are supported.
No change for fastsim as the results with the pf-based taggers are not as expected. There is more to understand there before swiching taggers also for fastsim.