updates to pairing logic: paring PU samples according to PU scenario

[anorkus]

Automatic pairing update to pair PU samples with same PU scenario when all the ROOT files are in same directory.

Signed-off-by: Antanas Norkus antanas.norkus@cern.ch

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @anorkus (Antanas Norkus) for CMSSW_7_4_X.

updates to pairing logic: paring PU samples according to PU scenario

It involves the following packages:

Utilities/RelMon

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @nclopezo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @wddgit this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: a58597d
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7575/2402/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7575/2402/summary.html

[slava77]

+1

for #7575 a58597d

@nclopezo which RelMon version does jenkins pick up to run comparisons when a PR with a change in RelMon comes up?

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @ktf, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1

[nclopezo]

Hi @slava77,

It always uses the version from the IB that is being used to run the tests. So in this case it used the version from CMSSW_7_4_X_2015-02-05-0200. I can change it if you want.

[slava77]

Hi David,
It's a bit recursive here, since it introduces a need to compare comparison tool :)
It would be more practical to run RelMon twice in this case, once for the IB and once for the IB+PR.