Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Including PsuedoTop in TQAF #7670

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Mar 12, 2015
Merged

Conversation

jhgoh
Copy link
Contributor

@jhgoh jhgoh commented Feb 11, 2015

A common definition for particle level top quark is implemented as a part of TQAF.

Most of definitions are synchronised with the common definition in LHC working group
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LHCPhysics/ParticleLevelTopDefinitions

Particle level objects are defined as below, some are not in the twiki page:

  • Leptons - anti-kT 0.1 with photons and leptons not from hadron decay. In addition, required core lepton have to have at least 50% of total momentum.
  • Neutrinos - take status=1 neutrinos
  • Jets - anti-kT 0.5 jets including neutrinos, excluding particles used in Lepton clustering. Rescaled (ghost) B hadrons are also added during jet clustering to be used gen. level b tagging
  • W boson - do the combinations and pick the best pairs which is near to PDG value
  • top quark - similar to W bosons

Default cfg.py is configured to run on miniAOD, it can be run on usual genParticles.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @jhgoh (Junghwan John Goh) for CMSSW_7_4_X.

Including PsuedoTop in TQAF

It involves the following packages:

TopQuarkAnalysis/TopEventProducers

@cmsbuild, @vadler, @nclopezo, @monttj can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@monttj
Copy link
Contributor

monttj commented Mar 12, 2015

+1
as it is also done in 75X

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @ktf, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants