Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add MiniAOD sequences, add RECO vs MiniAOD comparisons in Harvesting Module #7977

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Mar 11, 2015

Conversation

webermat
Copy link
Contributor

add functionality to compare MINIAOD and RECO DQM Offline output in Harvesting module for Jets and MET. Add MiniAOD sequences into official DQM sequences

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @webermat for CMSSW_7_5_X.

add MiniAOD sequences, add RECO vs MiniAOD comparisons in Harvesting Module

It involves the following packages:

DQMOffline/Configuration
DQMOffline/JetMET

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @nclopezo, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @ahinzmann, @mmarionncern, @rappoccio, @nhanvtran, @schoef, @mariadalfonso, @threus, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@nclopezo, @ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @ktf, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants