Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix RecoParticleFlow producers as reported by static analyser #7998

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 1, 2015

Conversation

diguida
Copy link
Contributor

@diguida diguida commented Feb 28, 2015

Technical bug fixes already proposed in 73X as part of #7941

  • In RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterProducer/src/PFClusterEMEnergyCorrector.cc added a guard against dividing by 0, in case some bug in the future might allow reco::PFCluster::energy() to return a 0 value;
  • In RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer/src/PFAlgo.ccremoved not needed calculation within a loop.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @diguida (Salvatore Di Guida) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Fix RecoParticleFlow producers as reported by static analyser

It involves the following packages:

RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterProducer
RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @nclopezo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmarionncern, @bachtis, @lgray this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@nclopezo, @ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@diguida
Copy link
Contributor Author

diguida commented Feb 28, 2015

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Mar 1, 2015

+1

for #7998 6a10a2c
the code changes were approved already as a part of #7941
jenkins tests here confirm there are no changes in monitored outputs

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 1, 2015

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @ktf, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants