updating Fast Timing WFs

[boudoul]

1. Rename RecoFullFast to RecoFullFastTimer to avoid confusion
2. Changing the WF according to the last wishes from @simonepigazzini and @amartelli
   The WF will be tested with relvals

(Reminder : recipe for FastTiming WF : runTheMatrix.py --what upgrade -l 160XX )

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @boudoul (boudoul) for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC.

updating Fast Timing WFs

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation
SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration

@civanch, @nclopezo, @boudoul, @franzoni, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@fratnikov, @mark-grimes you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[mark-grimes]

I'll test this privately since 160xx isn't part of the default tests.
@boudoul, didn't they want TrackingParticles in the event content too (I'm surprised it's not already)?

[simonepigazzini]

@mark-grimes: we changed our mind regarding the sim tracks and vertices collections, we are now asking to keep the CrossingFrame Vtxs and Tracks collections since they better fit our needs. Anyway the Tracking collections are not included in the RECOSIM eventcontent by default (or at least they are not included with the sequence we are running).

[cmsbuild]

-1
Tested at: 2a34bd2
The relvals timed out after 1 hour.

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8457/2978/summary.html

[mark-grimes]

merge

Tested with 16000 and 16061 privately since the fast timer is not in the standard tests.

[mark-grimes]

By the way, the tests took several hours but I think there were general problems with database access today.