conddb improvements

[apfeiffer1]

• show size of payloads in search (still to be verified);
• switch to no-color mode if stdout is pipe

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @apfeiffer1 (Andreas Pfeiffer) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

conddb improvements

It involves the following packages:

CondCore/Utilities

@ggovi, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 9b3b0a7
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8769/4288/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #8769 was updated. @ggovi can you please check and sign again.

[ggovi]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @ktf, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8769/4288/summary.html

The workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @ktf, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1