HighMET, MuTau, TopMuEG Skims

[alkaloge]

No description provided.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @alkaloge for CMSSW_7_5_X.

HighMET, MuTau, TopMuEG Skims

It involves the following packages:

DPGAnalysis/Skims

@cmsbuild, @srimanob, @nclopezo, @boudoul, @franzoni can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 5f56a85
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8897/4457/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8897/4457/summary.html

The workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 5f56a85
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8897/2534/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8897/2534/summary.html

[franzoni]

hello @davidlange6 , would it be possible to have this pr in the pre5, even if it'll come before the next orp ? Cheers, g.

[davidlange6]

+1

@franzoni- i'm approving stuff in the development release as it gets approved by L2s and a small review on my side