Fix switch to ak8GenJetsNoNu in miniaod

[ahinzmann]

In the previous PR #8241 where MiniAOD GenJets were switched to NoNu, AK8GenJetsNoNu were forgotten.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @ahinzmann for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Fix switch to ak8GenJetsNoNu in miniaod

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/PatAlgos

@cmsbuild, @vadler, @nclopezo, @monttj can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @imarches, @acaudron, @mmarionncern, @jdolen, @nhanvtran, @schoef, @ferencek, @gpetruc, @mariadalfonso, @pvmulder, @TaiSakuma this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 9fae722
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9121/3754/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9121/3754/summary.html

[ahinzmann]

@gpetruc
It would be nice to have this fixed for the next round of MiniAODs. Is a backport of this PR to 7_4_X needed for that?

[gpetruc]

We still have to see whether the next round will be made with 74X or 75X.
Anyway, for the moment it should not be backported to 74X: the PR can be
made, but it should not be merged, since the 74X production is still
ongoing.

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:43 AM, ahinzmann notifications@github.com wrote:

@gpetruc https://github.com/gpetruc
It would be nice to have this fixed for the next round of MiniAODs. Is a
backport of this PR to 7_4_X needed for that?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#9121 (comment).

[davidlange6]

+1