Adding DB - config factor comparison to reader for SiPixelDynamicInefficiency

[bartokm]

No structural changes, just including a DB - config comparison code, which verifies the DB content to previously used config file content.

Adding 13TeV 25ns config file factors to the SiPixelDynamicInefficiencyReader and make a comparison to factors stored in the DB.

Adding 13TeV 25ns v1 factors as standard in the sqlite creating config 'SiPixelDynamicInefficiencyDB_cfg.py'.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bartokm for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Adding DB - config factor comparison to reader for SiPixelDynamicInefficiency

It involves the following packages:

CondTools/SiPixel

@ggovi, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@apfeiffer1, @dkotlins, @VinInn this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 77393c7
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9132/5277/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9132/5277/summary.html

[ggovi]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1