Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Secondary input source improvements/fixes (backport of #9091) #9140

Merged

Conversation

mark-grimes
Copy link

Backports fixes to secondary file sources to SLHC that were made to 75X in #9091. More details on there.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mark-grimes (Mark Grimes) for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC.

Secondary input source improvements/fixes (backport of #9091)

It involves the following packages:

IOPool/Input
IOPool/SecondaryInput

@cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones, @nclopezo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@wddgit, @wmtan this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@fratnikov, @mark-grimes you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@mark-grimes
Copy link
Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@mark-grimes
Copy link
Author

merge

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2015
Secondary input source improvements/fixes (backport of #9091)
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 8eb0697 into cms-sw:CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC May 19, 2015
@mark-grimes mark-grimes deleted the fixSecondaryInputSource branch May 19, 2015 13:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants