Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Customize HLT for new jet correctors #9426

Merged

Conversation

Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

This is the last modification needed in order to have all standard workflows have their modules' call all the needed consumes. This pull request replaces the old jet correctors which used a product from the EventSetup with the new jet correctors which use a product from the Event. This switch was already made in all non-HLT workflows.

The new jet corrector mechanism must be used in order to complete the consumes migration.
This change adds a new customize function to handle the conversion from the old jet correctors
to the new ones.
Certain tools expect all elements on a Path to have a label defined.
Attaching the newly created Sequences to the Process guarantees that
those Sequences have a label.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 2, 2015

A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Customize HLT for new jet correctors

It involves the following packages:

HLTrigger/Configuration

@Martin-Grunewald, @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @fwyzard can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @geoff-smith, @jalimena this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

I made sure that all tests from addOnTests.py still pass after this modification.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 2, 2015

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 2, 2015

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 3, 2015

-1
Tested at: 4a6a05a
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
50202.0 step2

runTheMatrix-results/50202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU50+RECOUP15_PU50+HARVESTUP15_PU50+MINIAODMCUP1550/step2_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU50+RECOUP15_PU50+HARVESTUP15_PU50+MINIAODMCUP1550.log
----- Begin Fatal Exception 03-Jun-2015 18:29:51 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'Configuration' occurred while
   [0] Processing run: 1 lumi: 1 event: 1
   [1] Running path 'digitisation_step'
   [2] Calling event method for module MixingModule/'mix'
Exception Message:
RootInputFileSequence::readOneRandom(): no input files specified for secondary input source.
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

25202.0 step3

runTheMatrix-results/25202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25+MINIAODMCUP15/step3_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25+MINIAODMCUP15.log
----- Begin Fatal Exception 03-Jun-2015 18:48:47 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'Configuration' occurred while
   [0] Processing run: 1 lumi: 1 event: 1
   [1] Running path 'validation_step'
   [2] Calling event method for module MixingModule/'mix'
Exception Message:
RootInputFileSequence::readOneSpecified(): no input files specified for secondary input source.
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9426/5257/summary.html

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

DAS still causing the tests to fail.

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2015

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

@Dr15Jones
Your PR was very helpful in understanding what needs to be done for this migration in ConfDB, keeping the 'syntactical sugar' coating of intermediate sequences. I have done so and our next HLT update contains this migration already for the development menus. The frozen menus are not migrated so still need this PR. From looking at your python code I conclude that when running it on a configuration already migrated, it will simply do nothing, which is of course what we want in that case.

@Dr15Jones Dr15Jones deleted the customizeHLTforNewJetCorrectors branch August 14, 2015 18:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants