Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

limit the proofsrv slaves to be only two for these unit tests #9446

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 7, 2015
Merged

limit the proofsrv slaves to be only two for these unit tests #9446

merged 1 commit into from Jun 7, 2015

Conversation

smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

Default limit is 12 and during IB validation (which now runs on openstack machines) one of the proofserv.exe hanging. This should avoid these stable processes

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2015

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

limit the proofsrv slaves to be only two for these unit tests

It involves the following packages:

FWCore/TFWLiteSelector

@cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @wddgit, @wmtan this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2015
limit the proofsrv slaves to be only two for these unit tests
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit ab71347 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_5_X Jun 7, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants