Cosmic GEN configuration with tighter pointing cuts

[battibass]

This PR includes a GEN configuration to prodce cosmic muons and filter them with tighter pointing requirement w.r.t. what done with runTheMatrix.py -l 1307.
That configuration is tuned to generate "super-pointing" muons that are needed to compare the muon pT assignment performance in DATA and MC. It skims more muons at GEN-SIM level, thus is more efficient to produce events similar to the ones we want to study.
After discussing with @franzoni , it was agreed to include this configuration in RelVal workflows and ask for a RelVal based pre-production to perform a validation round before requestiong for a larger Cosmic production.
Just the GEN fragment and the filter are included in this PR, eventual extension of the matrix should be taken care of by PdmV.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @battibass (Carlo Battilana) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Cosmic GEN configuration with tighter pointing cuts

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Generator
GeneratorInterface/GenFilters

@vciulli, @cmsbuild, @covarell, @bendavid, @thuer can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @Martin-Grunewald, @mkirsano this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[bendavid]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

-1
Tested at: d592072
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
25202.0 step2

runTheMatrix-results/25202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25+MINIAODMCUP15/step2_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25+MINIAODMCUP15.log

50202.0 step2

runTheMatrix-results/50202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU50+RECOUP15_PU50+HARVESTUP15_PU50+MINIAODMCUP1550/step2_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU50+RECOUP15_PU50+HARVESTUP15_PU50+MINIAODMCUP1550.log

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9469/4029/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: d592072
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9469/5436/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1