New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HLT name changed #9675
HLT name changed #9675
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @KiSooLee for CMSSW_7_5_X. HLT name changed It involves the following packages: DQMOffline/Trigger @cmsbuild, @danduggan, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
-1 runTheMatrix-results/50202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU50+RECOUP15_PU50+HARVESTUP15_PU50+MINIAODMCUP1550/step2_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU50+RECOUP15_PU50+HARVESTUP15_PU50+MINIAODMCUP1550.log ----- Begin Fatal Exception 19-Jun-2015 10:03:34 CEST----------------------- An exception of category 'Configuration' occurred while [0] Constructing the EventProcessor [1] Constructing module: class=MixingModule label='mix' Exception Message: RootEmbeddedFileSequence no input files specified for secondary input source. ----- End Fatal Exception ------------------------------------------------- 25202.0 step3 runTheMatrix-results/25202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25+MINIAODMCUP15/step3_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25+MINIAODMCUP15.log ----- Begin Fatal Exception 19-Jun-2015 10:16:25 CEST----------------------- An exception of category 'Configuration' occurred while [0] Constructing the EventProcessor [1] Constructing module: class=MixingModule label='mix' Exception Message: RootEmbeddedFileSequence no input files specified for secondary input source. ----- End Fatal Exception ------------------------------------------------- you can see the results of the tests here: |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar |
Since data taking (and corresponding validation) is actually done with 74X, does it exist (or do you foresee) a 74X counterpart of this pull request? |
Dear Andrea, The corresponding 74X PR was already merged: #9037. Cheers, |
One of HLT name change for low pile up pp run