Update NEWS.md, add cran-comments.md

.Rbuildignore

@@ -14,4 +14,6 @@
 ^vignettes/articles$
 ^logo.svg$
 ^data-raw$
-^tests/_snaps/*
+^tests/_snaps/*
+^cran-comments.md$
+^CRAN-SUBMISSION$

CRAN-SUBMISSION

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Version: 0.4.0
+Date: 2024-05-06 13:34:25 UTC
+SHA: bcc13a7d1155d18d01fa58e50fd7df8d44aab04c

NEWS.md

@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+# Version 0.4.0
+- First release on CRAN
+- Minor documentation improvements
+
 # Version 0.3.0
 - Added functions for creating average stress-strain curves
   (`average_curve_lm` and `average_curve_optim`)

cran-comments.md

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+Re-submission of package `cmstatrExt` to address CRAN comments on submission
+made 06-May-2024.
+
+## Test environments
+- win-builder (`devel`, `release`, `oldrelease`)
+- local Ubuntu 22.04, R 4.4.0
+- GitHub Action runners:
+  - MacOS, R `release`
+  - Windows, R `release`
+  - Ubuntu, R `devel`
+  - Ubuntu, R `release`
+  - Ubuntu, R `oldrel`
+
+## R CMD check results
+There were no `ERRORs` or `WARNINGs`.
+
+There was one expected `NOTE` on win-builder due to this being a new submission.
+
+When built on Ubuntu, there is a `NOTE` related to the `libs` directory being
+over 1 MB. I understand this to be a common `NOTE` for packages using `Rcpp`.
+
+## Downstream dependencies
+There are no downstream dependencies.
+
+## Response to Initial Submission (2024-06-06)
+
+
+>> Please add \value to .Rd files regarding exported methods and explain 
+>> the functions results in the documentation. Please write about the 
+>> structure of the output (class) and also what the output means. (If a 
+>> function does not return a value, please document that too, e.g. 
+>> \value{No return value, called for side effects} or similar)
+>> Missing Rd-tags:
+>>      power_sim_dual.Rd: \value
+
+The \value tag was added to power_sim_dual.Rd. No other instances of missing
+\value tag were found.
+
+>> \dontrun{} should only be used if the example really cannot be executed 
+>> (e.g. because of missing additional software, missing API keys, ...) by 
+>> the user. That's why wrapping examples in \dontrun{} adds the comment 
+>> ("# Not run:") as a warning for the user. Does not seem necessary. 
+>> Please replace \dontrun with \donttest.
+>> Please unwrap the examples if they are executable in < 5 sec, or replace 
+>> dontrun{} with \donttest{}.
+>> Please wrap examples that need packages in ‘Suggests’ in 
+>> if(requireNamespace("pkgname")){} instead.
+>> -> iso_equiv_two_sample.Rd
+
+\dontrun replaced with \donttest since this example takes ~30 seconds to run
+on my PC. The example wrapped in `if(requireNamespace("tidyverse")){}`
+
+>> Please fix and resubmit.