Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[CNSWP v2] Verify and update references of SIG Security with Security TAG #833

Closed
PushkarJ opened this issue Dec 5, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

[CNSWP v2] Verify and update references of SIG Security with Security TAG #833

PushkarJ opened this issue Dec 5, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
@captainarcher
Labels
suggestion New suggestion for the CNCF sig-security group that don't fall into an existing category whitepaper Related to discussion of white papers

Comments

@PushkarJ
Copy link
Collaborator

PushkarJ commented Dec 5, 2021

Description: #613 happened after v1 was published. So v1 needs an update to refer us as Security TAG instead of CNCF SIG Security

Impact: To keep up to date with now established convention of referring CNCF level groups as TAGs

Scope: Find references of SIG Security and replace them with Security TAG

Additional info:
In scope of #747
@PushkarJ PushkarJ added suggestion New suggestion for the CNCF sig-security group that don't fall into an existing category triage-required Requires triage labels Dec 5, 2021
@PushkarJ PushkarJ changed the title [CNSWP v2] Verify and update references of SIG Security with Security TAG / TAG Security [CNSWP v2] Verify and update references of SIG Security with Security TAG Dec 5, 2021
@PushkarJ PushkarJ mentioned this issue Dec 5, 2021
Closed
21 tasks
@captainarcher
Copy link
Contributor

I am volunteering to be the owner for this

@TheFoxAtWork TheFoxAtWork added whitepaper Related to discussion of white papers and removed triage-required Requires triage labels Jan 19, 2022
@PushkarJ
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@captainarcher I have not found a mention of SIG Security on the working google doc but please do a review from your side too. If you don't find anything too, let's close this one out

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 22, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as inactive because it has not had recent activity.

@stale stale bot added the inactive No activity on issue/PR label Mar 22, 2022
@PushkarJ PushkarJ removed the inactive No activity on issue/PR label Mar 24, 2022
@PushkarJ
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No references were found. So closing this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@captainarcher captainarcher

Labels
suggestion New suggestion for the CNCF sig-security group that don't fall into an existing category whitepaper Related to discussion of white papers
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@PushkarJ @TheFoxAtWork @captainarcher