-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Scalability Test: Can CNF increase and decrease capacity? #24
Comments
Acceptance Criteria for peer review:Common steps
When using the test increase_decrease_capacity command the CNF should PASS the increase and decrease test successfully:
The CNF should scale-up in capacity when the increase successfully
The CNF should scale-down in capacity when the decrease successfully
I would expect the CNF to pass the increase and decrease test when the scalability category runs
I would expect the CNF to pass the increase and decrease test when I run the entire test suite (
|
Initial task planning https://hackmd.io/Be2pyIA4Tue-HMT3KdfOPA |
…eases capacity to 3 replicas and decreases capacity to 1 replica
Level of effort in pts: 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, infinity: 8 pts@wavell 8 pts |
…documentation for setup and uses command line arguments
PoC #22 |
@taylor went through A/C and all steps passed, closing issue |
Acceptance Criteria
Scalability Test: Can CNF increase and decrease capacity?
EPIC: CNF Conformance Test Suite
Release: v0.0.1
Test Category: Scalability
Type of test (static or runtime) = Runtime
Environment set up tasks:
export KUBECONFIG=~/shared/conformance01.kubeconfig)
git fetch ; get rebase
from the cnf-conformance directory)shard install
to get dependenciesUpstream tool set up tasks: (conformance suite + upstream tools)
CNF setup Tasks
Sample CNF tasks:
Code implementation tasks:
all
)Documentation tasks:
QA tasks
Dev Review:
Steps after A/C Passes for developer:
If all A/C passes for developer
Peer review:
Reviewer Approved
columnSteps after A/C fails
If all A/C fails for peer reviewer
Steps after A/C Passes for peer reviewer
master
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: