-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nested or multiple filter collections #1
Comments
That's odd, I tested it with quite a few different variations but obviously not two collections like that. Will have a look at it when I get chance. |
Line 85, return evaluateFilters $Filter then it seems to work, at least it did when I tested it with your first XML, the second one in the screenshot the "user in group" bits are following an empty collection, rather than being inside the collection. |
Hi !
Thanks a lot for your time ! It works as intended :)
I'll soon won't be able to create my own gpp, so I'm using your script to
process all my existing gpp files (shortcuts, printers, files, whatever)
with a fine item level targeting.
Best regards,
Le mar. 2 févr. 2021 à 18:17, CoasterKaty <notifications@github.com> a
écrit :
… Line 85, return evaluateFilters $Filter
Should read:
$return = evaluateFilters $Filter
then it seems to work, at least it did when I tested it with your first
XML, the second one in the screenshot the "user in group" bits are
following an empty collection, rather than being inside the collection.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAY7F7THD5IWJ6D6GMGK7DDS5AXT3ANCNFSM4W6OSYMQ>
.
|
Hi !
First of all thanks a lot for this script, it's a very nice one to work with :)
I have some issues with nested filter collections, the filter function doesn't seem to work (at least for me ?).
For example, if I have in my xml
Which looks like this in gpp editor
Even if the first collection conditions are not met, printer will be deployed if the second collection conditions are met.
If I change the rules to be like this :
Which looks like this in gpp editor
Even if the second collection conditions are not met, printer will be deployed (because the first collection conditions are met).
Thanks !
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: