-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Podfile DSL #26
Milestone
Comments
I like the DSL better. The syntax is easier to remember (especially for those who are not Rubyists), and looks more like a 'config' file syntax. |
That’s a very good point, Mike! (Re: for the not Rubyists.) |
This is the current show stopper for 0.1.0, which I hope to be able to implement tonight. |
jzapater
pushed a commit
to jzapater/CocoaPods
that referenced
this issue
Sep 17, 2013
Added PINView podspec
alloy
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 25, 2014
fabiopelosin
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 25, 2014
[Specification] Add support for framework_bundles
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
With the addition of the `platform' attribute being important in a Podfile, it became clear that we’ll have to rethink the way in which a Podfile is defined a bit. For now (in master) I have changed it to be the same as a normal specification:
However, this will become more of an aesthetic issue once we, for example, add the API to define dependency groups:
We could create a separate DSL for a Podfile which assigns attributes without the
=
sign, which would make it possible to retain the previous way of defining a Podfile:I’m still on the fence about this, please let me know what you think.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: