Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Packing storage variables in Auction would save gas #109

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Sep 21, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Packing storage variables in Auction would save gas #109

code423n4 opened this issue Sep 21, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Warden finding G (Gas Optimization) sponsor acknowledged Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

t11s

Vulnerability details

Impact

Gas is wasted by not packing storage variables in Auction. Combining smaller value types to fill 256 slots would drastically reduce the number of SLOADs and SSTORES used in the contract.

Proof of Concept

https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-09-defiProtocol/blob/52b74824c42acbcd64248f68c40128fe3a82caf6/contracts/contracts/Auction.sol#L16-L21

code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 21, 2021
@frank-beard frank-beard added the sponsor acknowledged Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons label Nov 6, 2021
@GalloDaSballo
Copy link
Collaborator

Agree that packing the booleans would reduce gas cost, as with all findings providing an example is best

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Warden finding G (Gas Optimization) sponsor acknowledged Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants