Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explicit initialization with zero not required #126

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Dec 23, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Explicit initialization with zero not required #126

code423n4 opened this issue Dec 23, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor acknowledged Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

Dravee

Vulnerability details

Impact

Explicit initialization with zero is not required for variable declaration because uints are 0 by default. Removing this will reduce contract size and save a bit of gas.

Proof of Concept

Instances include:

./staking-rewards/StakingRewards.sol:26:    uint256 public periodFinish = 0;
./staking-rewards/StakingRewards.sol:27:    uint256 public rewardRate = 0;
./tokens/USDV.sol:152:        for (uint256 i = 0; i < userLocks.length; i++) {
./tokens/vesting/LinearVesting.sol:169:        for (uint256 i = 0; i < vesters.length; ++i) {

Tools Used

Manual Analysis

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Remove explicit initialization with zero. It's already done at several places and in most for-loops, which means that this optimization would be consistent with the overall code style.

@code423n4 code423n4 added bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) labels Dec 23, 2021
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 23, 2021
@SamSteinGG SamSteinGG added the sponsor acknowledged Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons label Mar 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor acknowledged Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants