Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Less than 256 uints are not gas efficient #123

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Dec 21, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Less than 256 uints are not gas efficient #123

code423n4 opened this issue Dec 21, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor acknowledged Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

defsec

Vulnerability details

Impact

Lower than uint256 size storage instance variables are actually less gas efficient. E.g. using uint8 does not give any efficiency, actually, it is the opposite as EVM operates on default of 256-bit values so uint8 is more expensive in this case as it needs a conversion. It only gives improvements in cases where you can pack variables together, e.g. structs.

Proof of Concept

  1. Navigate to the following contracts.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-12-yetifinance/blob/1da782328ce4067f9654c3594a34014b0329130a/packages/contracts/contracts/AssetWrappers/WJLP/ERC20_8.sol#L11

https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-12-yetifinance/blob/1da782328ce4067f9654c3594a34014b0329130a/packages/contracts/contracts/YETI/sYETIToken.sol#L37

Tools Used

None

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Consider to review all uint types. Change them with uint256 If the integer is not necessary to present with 8.

@code423n4 code423n4 added bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) labels Dec 21, 2021
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 21, 2021
@kingyetifinance kingyetifinance added the sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity") label Jan 6, 2022
@0xtruco 0xtruco added sponsor acknowledged Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons and removed sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity") labels Jan 14, 2022
@0xtruco
Copy link
Collaborator

0xtruco commented Jan 14, 2022

Nvm, seems standard for decimals to be uint8

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor acknowledged Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants