Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BalanceHandler.sol:getBalanceStorage(): store is used only once and shouldn't get cached #125

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Jan 31, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

Dravee

Vulnerability details

Impact

Increased gas cost

Proof of Concept

store is a variable used only once. A comment should suffice instead of a variable (see @Audit-Info):

File: BalanceHandler.sol
72:         mapping(address => mapping(uint256 => BalanceStorage)) storage store = LibStorage.getBalanceStorage(); //@audit-info store is used only once, below
73:         BalanceStorage storage balanceStorage = store[account][currencyId];

Tools Used

VS Code

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Do not store this data in a variable. Inline it instead:

BalanceStorage storage balanceStorage = LibStorage.getBalanceStorage()[account][currencyId];
@code423n4 code423n4 added bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) labels Jan 31, 2022
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 31, 2022
@jeffywu jeffywu added the sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity") label Feb 6, 2022
@pauliax
Copy link
Collaborator

pauliax commented Feb 15, 2022

Valid optimization. I am grouping this together with other similar submissions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants