You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
CitadelMinter.sol::301 => "CitadelMinter: Sum of propvalues must be 10000 bps"
CitadelMinter.sol::321 => "CitadelMinter: last mint timestamp already initialized"
CitadelMinter.sol::328 => "CitadelMinter: supply schedule start not initialized"
CitadelMinter.sol::370 => "CitadelMinter: funding pool does not exist for removal"
CitadelMinter.sol::377 => "CitadelMinter: funding pool already exists"
Funding.sol::148 => "Funding: citadel price from oracle flagged and pending review"
Funding.sol::298 => "cannot decrease cap below global sum of assets in"
Funding.sol::325 => "cannot sweep funding asset, use claimAssetToTreasury()"
Funding.sol::390 => "Funding: sale recipient should not be zero"
GlobalAccessControl.sol::118 => "Role string and role do not match"
KnightingRound.sol::122 => "KnightingRound: start date may not be in the past"
KnightingRound.sol::126 => "KnightingRound: the sale duration must not be zero"
KnightingRound.sol::130 => "KnightingRound: the price must not be zero"
KnightingRound.sol::134 => "KnightingRound: sale recipient should not be zero"
KnightingRound.sol::273 => require(!finalized, "KnightingRound: already finalized");
KnightingRound.sol::277 => "KnightingRound: not enough balance"
KnightingRound.sol::295 => "KnightingRound: start date may not be in the past"
KnightingRound.sol::297 => require(!finalized, "KnightingRound: already finalized");
KnightingRound.sol::314 => "KnightingRound: the sale duration must not be zero"
KnightingRound.sol::316 => require(!finalized, "KnightingRound: already finalized");
KnightingRound.sol::333 => "KnightingRound: the price must not be zero"
KnightingRound.sol::351 => "KnightingRound: sale recipient should not be zero"
KnightingRound.sol::384 => require(!finalized, "KnightingRound: already finalized");
StakedCitadel.sol::192 => "performanceFeeGovernance too high"
StakedCitadel.sol::196 => "performanceFeeStrategist too high"
StakedCitadel.sol::508 => "Please withdrawToVault before changing strat"
StakedCitadel.sol::537 => "performanceFeeStrategist too high"
StakedCitadel.sol::632 => "Excessive strategist performance fee"
StakedCitadel.sol::652 => "Excessive governance performance fee"
StakedCitadelVester.sol::137 => require(msg.sender == vault, "StakedCitadelVester: only xCTDL vault");
StakedCitadelVester.sol::138 => require(_amount > 0, "StakedCitadelVester: cannot vest 0");
SupplySchedule.sol::62 => "SupplySchedule: minting not started"
SupplySchedule.sol::92 => "SupplySchedule: minting not started"
SupplySchedule.sol::96 => "SupplySchedule: already minted up to current block"
SupplySchedule.sol::139 => "SupplySchedule: minting already started"
SupplySchedule.sol::143 => "SupplySchedule: minting must start at or after current time"
SupplySchedule.sol::157 => "SupplySchedule: rate already set for given epoch"
SupplySchedule.sol::181 => "SupplySchedule: minting not started"
SupplySchedule.sol::185 => "SupplySchedule: attempting to mint before start block"
SupplySchedule.sol::189 => "SupplySchedule: already minted up to current block"
SupplySchedule.sol::227 => "total mintable after this iteration",
Prefix increments are cheaper than postfix increments
CitadelMinter.sol::152 => for (uint256 i = 0; i < numPools; i++) {
SupplySchedule.sol::208 => for (uint256 i = startingEpoch; i <= endingEpoch; i++) {
lib/GlobalAccessControlManaged.sol::48 => for (uint256 i = 0; i < roles.length; i++) {
test/BaseFixture.sol::293 => for (uint256 i = 0; i < numAddressesToTrack; i++) {
test/utils/Utils.sol::21 => digits++;
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Issues found
Don't Initialize Variables with Default Value
Impact
Issue Information: G001 - variables with default value
Findings:
Cache Array Length Outside of Loop
Impact
Issue Information: G002 - array length outside loop
Findings:
Long Revert Strings
Impact
Issue Information: G007 - long (revert) strings
Findings:
Prefix increments are cheaper than postfix increments
Impact
Issue Information: G009 - Prefix increments are cheaper than postfix increments
Findings:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: