Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gas Optimizations #96

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Gas Optimizations #96

code423n4 opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

C4-001 : ++i is more gas efficient than i++ in loops forwarding

Impact

++i is more gas efficient than i++ in loops forwarding.

Proof of Concept

  1. Navigate to the following contracts.
https://github.com/fei-protocol/xTRIBE/blob/989e47d176facbb0c38bc1e1ca58672f179159e1/src/xTRIBE.sol#L95

Tools Used

Code Review

Recommended Mitigation Steps

It is recommend to use unchecked{++i} and change i declaration to uint256.

C4-002 : There is no need to assign default values to variables

Impact - Gas Optimization

When a variable is declared solidity assigns the default value. In case the contract assigns the value again, it costs extra gas.

Example: uint x = 0 costs more gas than uint x without having any different functionality.

Proof of Concept


https://github.com/fei-protocol/xTRIBE/blob/989e47d176facbb0c38bc1e1ca58672f179159e1/src/xTRIBE.sol#L95

Tools Used

Code Review

Recommended Mitigation Steps

uint x = 0 costs more gas than uint x without having any different functionality.

C4-003 : Free gas savings for using solidity 0.8.10+

Impact

Using newer compiler versions and the optimizer gives gas optimizations and additional safety checks are available for free.

Proof of Concept

All Contracts

Solidity 0.8.10 has a useful change which reduced gas costs of external calls which expect a return value: https://blog.soliditylang.org/2021/11/09/solidity-0.8.10-release-announcement/

Code Generator: Skip existence check for external contract if return data is expected. In this case, the ABI decoder will revert if the contract does not exist

All Contracts

Tools Used

None

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Consider to upgrade pragma to at least 0.8.10.

C4-004 : Non-strict inequalities are cheaper than strict ones

Impact

Strict inequalities add a check of non equality which costs around 3 gas.

Proof of Concept

https://github.com/fei-protocol/xTRIBE/blob/989e47d176facbb0c38bc1e1ca58672f179159e1/src/xTRIBE.sol#L95

Tools Used

Code Review

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Use >= or <= instead of > and < when possible.

C4-005 : Check if amount > 0 before token transfer can save gas

Impact

Since _amount can be 0. Checking if (_amount != 0) before the transfer can potentially save an external call and the unnecessary gas cost of a 0 token transfer.

Proof of Concept

https://github.com/fei-protocol/xTRIBE/blob/989e47d176facbb0c38bc1e1ca58672f179159e1/src/xTRIBE.sol#L134

https://github.com/fei-protocol/xTRIBE/blob/989e47d176facbb0c38bc1e1ca58672f179159e1/src/xTRIBE.sol#L149

All Contracts

Tools Used

None

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Consider checking amount != 0.

C4-006 : Use Shift Right/Left instead of Division/Multiplication if possible

Impact

A division/multiplication by any number x being a power of 2 can be calculated by shifting log2(x) to the right/left.

While the DIV opcode uses 5 gas, the SHR opcode only uses 3 gas. Furthermore, Solidity's division operation also includes a division-by-0 prevention which is bypassed using shifting.

Code Location

https://github.com/fei-protocol/ERC4626/blob/643cd044fac34bcbf64e1c3790a5126fec0dbec1/src/xERC4626.sol#L89

Tools Used

None

Recommended Mitigation Steps

A division/multiplication by any number x being a power of 2 can be calculated by shifting log2(x) to the right/left.

@code423n4 code423n4 added bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) labels Apr 27, 2022
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants