Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Upgraded Q -> M from 277 [1657879283610] #448

Closed
code423n4 opened this issue Jul 15, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Upgraded Q -> M from 277 [1657879283610] #448

code423n4 opened this issue Jul 15, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Judge has assessed an item in Issue #277 as Medium risk. The relevant finding follows:
@code423n4 code423n4 added 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge labels Jul 15, 2022
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 15, 2022
@code423n4
Upgrade for GalloDaSballo issue #448
8565907
@HickupHH3
Copy link
Collaborator

HickupHH3 commented Jul 15, 2022 •
edited

Lock-in Fee with Order Creation

dup of #422

@HickupHH3 HickupHH3 added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Jul 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@code423n4 @HickupHH3