Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ChainLink pricer is using a deprecated API #165

Closed
code423n4 opened this issue Dec 13, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

ChainLink pricer is using a deprecated API #165

code423n4 opened this issue Dec 13, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate-655 satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Lines of code

https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-tigris/tree/main/contracts/utils/TradingLibrary.sol#L113

Vulnerability details

Description

According to Chainlink’s documentation, the latestAnswer function is deprecated.
This function might suddenly stop working if Chainlink stop supporting deprecated APIs. And the old API can return stale data.

Proof Of Concept

113: int256 assetChainlinkPriceInt = IPrice(_chainlinkFeed).latestAnswer();

https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-tigris/tree/main/contracts/utils/TradingLibrary.sol#L113

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Use the latestRoundData function to get the price instead. Add checks on the return data with proper revert messages if the price is stale or the round is uncomplet.
See docs for reference: https://docs.chain.link/docs/price-feeds-api-reference/

@code423n4 code423n4 added 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working labels Dec 13, 2022
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2022
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

GalloDaSballo marked the issue as duplicate of #655

@c4-judge c4-judge added the satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards label Jan 22, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

GalloDaSballo marked the issue as satisfactory

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate-655 satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants