Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tokens may be stuck on the ERC20 quest contract #427

Closed
code423n4 opened this issue Jan 30, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Tokens may be stuck on the ERC20 quest contract #427

code423n4 opened this issue Jan 30, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working downgraded by judge Judge downgraded the risk level of this issue duplicate-122 satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Lines of code

https://github.com/rabbitholegg/quest-protocol/blob/8c4c1f71221570b14a0479c216583342bd652d8d/contracts/Erc20Quest.sol#L85

Vulnerability details

Impact

If ProtocolFee were collected from ERC20 quest before calling withdrawRemainingTokens function, the amount of tokens to withdraw by withdrawRemainingTokens will be calculated wrong and tokens will be stuck on the contract.

Proof of Concept

Smart contract designed in a such way that creator of the quest may withdraw unused funds from the Quest after its ending.
The unused funds is calculates as Total balance on the contract less Unclaimed by participant less ProtocolFee.

 uint256 nonClaimableTokens = IERC20(rewardToken).balanceOf(address(this)) - protocolFee() - unclaimedTokens;

While amount of unclaimed tokens calculated at the moment of withdrawal, nature of ProtocolFee is a bit different.
ProtocolFee is static number calculated as percentage of the total amount of granted rewards. Contract does not check whether they were already withdrew from the contract or not.

So, if ProtocolFee were collected, their amount already subtracted from the balance of the ERC20 quest contract.
And thus while calculating nonClaimableTokens they would be subtracted second time and won't be withdrew from contract.
As these tokens are "free" and not claimable by participant, they would be stuck there forever.

Test

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Before calculating nonClaimableTokens check whether protocolFee was already collected or not

@code423n4 code423n4 added 3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly bug Something isn't working labels Jan 30, 2023
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

c4-judge commented Feb 6, 2023

kirk-baird marked the issue as duplicate of #61

@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

kirk-baird marked the issue as satisfactory

@c4-judge c4-judge added satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards duplicate-122 and removed duplicate-61 labels Feb 14, 2023
@c4-judge c4-judge added 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value and removed 3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly labels Feb 23, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

kirk-baird changed the severity to 2 (Med Risk)

@c4-judge c4-judge added the downgraded by judge Judge downgraded the risk level of this issue label Feb 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working downgraded by judge Judge downgraded the risk level of this issue duplicate-122 satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants