Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Everyone can mint token #432

Closed
code423n4 opened this issue Jan 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Everyone can mint token #432

code423n4 opened this issue Jan 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly bug Something isn't working duplicate-608 satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Lines of code

https://github.com/rabbitholegg/quest-protocol/blob/8c4c1f71221570b14a0479c216583342bd652d8d/contracts/RabbitHoleReceipt.sol#L58

Vulnerability details

Impact

In RabbitHoleReceipt.sol the mint function is completely unprotected and anyone can use it to mint tokens and cause other problems. This problem occurs because the onlyMinter modifier is not implemented correctly and does not actually protect the function. As a result, any address can mint new tokens. Absolutely the same problem has RabbitHoleTickets.sol contract.

Proof of Concept

RabbitHoleReceipt.sol

58: modifier onlyMinter() {
59:        msg.sender == minterAddress;
60:        _;
61:    }
RabbitHoleTickets.sol
47:     modifier onlyMinter() {
48:        msg.sender == minterAddress;
49:        _;
50:    }

Tools Used

Manual Review

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Change:

RabbitHoleReceipt.sol and RabbitHoleTickets.sol

	modifier onlyMinter() {
        msg.sender == minterAddress;
        _;
    }

To:

RabbitHoleReceipt.sol and RabbitHoleTickets.sol

	modifier onlyMinter() {
        require(msg.sender == minterAddress, "error message");
        _;
    }
@code423n4 code423n4 added 3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly bug Something isn't working labels Jan 30, 2023
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

c4-judge commented Feb 6, 2023

kirk-baird marked the issue as duplicate of #9

@c4-judge c4-judge closed this as completed Feb 6, 2023
@c4-judge c4-judge added the satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards label Feb 14, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

kirk-baird marked the issue as satisfactory

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly bug Something isn't working duplicate-608 satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants