Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Anyone can mint receipts, onlyMinter modifier missing require(), therefore it's basically useless. #97

Closed
code423n4 opened this issue Jan 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly bug Something isn't working duplicate-608 satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Lines of code

https://github.com/rabbitholegg/quest-protocol/blob/8c4c1f71221570b14a0479c216583342bd652d8d/contracts/RabbitHoleReceipt.sol#L58
https://github.com/rabbitholegg/quest-protocol/blob/8c4c1f71221570b14a0479c216583342bd652d8d/contracts/RabbitHoleTickets.sol#L47

Vulnerability details

Impact

Everyone and anyone can mint a receipt even though they are not an approved minterAddress.

Proof of Concept

In the docs is stated that : "We would like to call out extra attention to QuestFactory.mintReceipt (users should only be able to claim one receipt)".
Therefore it uses the RabbitHoleReceipt.mint, which is the function that uses the onlyMinter modifier since the onlyMinter modifier doesn't work accordingly anyone can choose to use different addresses to mint himself receipts and doing whatever he wants with them after that (sell them on secondary market or claim them).

Tools Used

Manual Audit, VS Code

Recommended Mitigation Steps

add require() statement in the modifier to ensure the msg.sender == minterAddress

@code423n4 code423n4 added 3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly bug Something isn't working labels Jan 27, 2023
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 27, 2023
@c4-judge c4-judge closed this as completed Feb 5, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

c4-judge commented Feb 5, 2023

kirk-baird marked the issue as duplicate of #9

@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

kirk-baird marked the issue as satisfactory

@c4-judge c4-judge added the satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards label Feb 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly bug Something isn't working duplicate-608 satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants