Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QA Report #91

Open
c4-bot-9 opened this issue Mar 20, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

QA Report #91

c4-bot-9 opened this issue Mar 20, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working grade-a Q-15 QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax sufficient quality report This report is of sufficient quality

Comments

@c4-bot-9
Copy link
Contributor

See the markdown file with the details of this report here.

@c4-bot-9 c4-bot-9 added bug Something isn't working QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax labels Mar 20, 2024
c4-bot-6 added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 20, 2024
c4-bot-3 added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 20, 2024
@raymondfam
Copy link

L4 to #22

L1: It's pre-checked and post-checked respectively by the source/destination function.
N4: It's going to cause type mismatch from bytes to unit256

2L and 3 NC.

@c4-pre-sort c4-pre-sort added the sufficient quality report This report is of sufficient quality label Mar 23, 2024
@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

raymondfam marked the issue as sufficient quality report

@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

3docSec marked the issue as grade-a

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working grade-a Q-15 QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax sufficient quality report This report is of sufficient quality
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants