Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change 'internal review' process #13

Closed
schlos opened this issue Mar 3, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Change 'internal review' process #13

schlos opened this issue Mar 3, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@schlos
Copy link
Member

schlos commented Mar 3, 2015

Current Alaveteli workflow is that requestor can ask for 'internal review' which is then sent again to same authority to the same email address to where original request was sent.

In Croatia we don't have 'internal review' process, it's rather done by Information Commissioner in form of appeals.

So, we would need to change workflow:

  • when user clicks 'request internal review' it is sent to always same email address to Information Commissioner (so it's like appeal).
  • this would be beneficial because it can be tracked under same thread, so user don't need to create separate request for Information Commissioner.
  • Information Commissioner email is one and always the same, so I think this can be safely setup in general.yml.

Frontend issue ticket is opened at codeforcroatia/imamopravoznati-theme#11

@schlos
Copy link
Member Author

schlos commented Dec 12, 2015

Duje:

Kad ne dođe odgovor na zahtjev – jedna od opcija za status treba biti „podnesena pisana žalba Povjerenici za informiranje“

Change appeal process just to add status "Appeal sent for this request" to track more easily what is actual status of request.

@schlos
Copy link
Member Author

schlos commented Jan 27, 2016

Related tickets:
mysociety#2819

@schlos
Copy link
Member Author

schlos commented Aug 28, 2021

Duplicates #93

@schlos schlos closed this as completed Aug 28, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant