Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update R Package Description.csv #224

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2023
Merged

Update R Package Description.csv #224

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2023

Conversation

clnsmth
Copy link
Contributor

@clnsmth clnsmth commented Oct 21, 2019

The "Version" field of the R Package DESCRIPTION aligns with both the "softwareVersion" and "version" concepts of CodeMeta and inherited from "SoftwareApplication" and "CreativeWork", respectively. Generally, "softwareVersion" is preferred over "version" as the former is inherited from the more specific "SoftwareApplication" type as opposed to the more general "CreativeWork".

NOTE: "softwareVersion" is typed text only, whereas "version" is typed to be either numeric or text. Also, the "softwareVersion" concept seems to be less frequently used than "version".

The "Version" field of the R Package DESCRIPTION aligns with both the "softwareVersion" and "version" concepts of CodeMeta and inherited from "SoftwareApplication" and "CreativeWork", respectively. Generally, "softwareVersion" is preferred over "version" as the former is inherited from the more specific "SoftwareApplication" type as opposed to the more general "CreativeWork".

NOTE: "softwareVersion" is typed text only, whereas "version" is typed to be either numeric or text. Also, the "softwareVersion" concept seems to be less frequently used than "version".
@mbjones mbjones added this to the v2.1 milestone Sep 28, 2020
@mbjones mbjones changed the base branch from master to develop June 6, 2022 17:59
@progval
Copy link
Member

progval commented Feb 16, 2023

Also, the "softwareVersion" concept seems to be less frequently used than "version".

Indeed, other crosswalks only have version, so we should do the same here for the sake of consistency.

@moranegg
Copy link
Contributor

This PR can be merged into V2.1 after modification (in the crosswalk release)
let's add a 2.1 tag to it

@progval
Copy link
Member

progval commented Feb 16, 2023

Relevant discussion: #264

@progval progval modified the milestones: v3.0, v2.1 Feb 16, 2023
@progval
Copy link
Member

progval commented Apr 24, 2023

Let's accept this; we can revisit the issue later when #264 is resolved instead of blocking for years.

@progval progval merged commit 72bb066 into codemeta:develop Apr 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants