Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bypass usage of LDAP when getting number of Codenvy on-prem users in Installation Manager #584

Closed
2 tasks done
dmytro-ndp opened this issue Aug 16, 2016 · 0 comments
Closed
2 tasks done
Milestone

Comments

@dmytro-ndp
Copy link
Contributor

dmytro-ndp commented Aug 16, 2016

There is a method com.codenvy.im.managers.LdapManager#getNumberOfUsers in Installation Manager which is used:

  1. by com.codenvy.im.service.LicenseService#isCodenvyUsageLegal to verify if Codenvy is being used legally according to Codenvy license;
  2. by com.codenvy.im.service.ReportSender#sendNumberOfUsers to send report with number of users to the data@codenvy.com ones a week on Sunday morning.

Fix stages:

This issue depends on #597.

@dmytro-ndp dmytro-ndp changed the title Bypass usage of LDAP DB when getting Codenvy on-prem usage number in Installation Manager Bypass usage of LDAP when getting Codenvy on-prem usage number in Installation Manager Aug 16, 2016
@dmytro-ndp dmytro-ndp changed the title Bypass usage of LDAP when getting Codenvy on-prem usage number in Installation Manager Bypass usage of LDAP when getting Codenvy on-prem user number in Installation Manager Aug 16, 2016
@dmytro-ndp dmytro-ndp changed the title Bypass usage of LDAP when getting Codenvy on-prem user number in Installation Manager Bypass usage of LDAP when getting number of Codenvy on-prem users in Installation Manager Aug 16, 2016
@JamesDrummond JamesDrummond added this to the 5.0.0-M2 milestone Sep 13, 2016
@riuvshin riuvshin modified the milestones: 5.0.0-M3, 5.0.0-M2 Sep 20, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants