Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 14, 2020. It is now read-only.

Remove hyphen from "RFC-003" when present #77

Closed
tcharding opened this issue Jun 19, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Remove hyphen from "RFC-003" when present #77

tcharding opened this issue Jun 19, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@tcharding
Copy link
Collaborator

tcharding commented Jun 19, 2019

DoD:
The following commands return 0 when executed in all coblox & comit-network repositories.

  • $ git grep -i 'rfc-00[0-9]' | wc -l
@D4nte
Copy link
Contributor

D4nte commented Jun 19, 2019

I thing we should jump directly into the core of the debate: shouldn't we use "basic-swap" everywhere instead?

@tcharding
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Agreed, that is the core of the debate. I'm shy on the word 'basic'. Generally, IMO, it is bad practice to name things with subjective terms like 'basic' since these inevitable change as time goes on. A more concrete name would fair better as the project matures. 'basic-swap' is swap between two ledgers with certain characteristics (or requirements), right?. Can we name these? Can we come up with a protocol name that includes/describes these requirements?

@D4nte
Copy link
Contributor

D4nte commented Jun 20, 2019

After talking with Daniel I propose "Basic HTLC Atomic Swap".
Alternative I could see: "Simple HTLC Atomic Swap" (but I guess it does not help).

Happy to discuss more with you/team to find a better terminology.

@D4nte D4nte changed the title RFC naming is not consistent Remove hyphen from "RFC-003" when present Jul 10, 2019
@bonomat
Copy link
Member

bonomat commented Oct 28, 2019

We plan to rename RFC003: I propose removing the hyphen while doing #130

@bonomat bonomat closed this as completed Oct 28, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants