Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feedback on tool-description.md #13

Merged
1 commit merged into from Dec 24, 2014
Merged

Feedback on tool-description.md #13

1 commit merged into from Dec 24, 2014

Conversation

qwrrty
Copy link
Contributor

@qwrrty qwrrty commented Dec 22, 2014

Comments, suggestions and minor changes for the tool description document.

Comments, suggestions and minor changes for the tool description document.
@@ -83,22 +77,25 @@ capture the tool output, or propagate values from input to output.

# Execution

A [tool command line](#command-line-adapter) is built based on the
[Job order document](#job-order-document).
A *tool command line* is built based on the [adapter field](#command-line-adapter) of the
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, Tim. Thanks for the patch!

The JobOrder doesn't have an adapter field. Those are in the tool description document. The wording of "corresponding value from JobOrder for the adapter" was likely confusing. It refers to the input value.

For example, if you have

{
  "inputs": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "int1": {"type": "integer"}
    }
}

and the job order

{
  "inputs": {
    "int1": 3
  }
}

... the "corresponding value in JobOrder for int1 is 3.

ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2014
Feedback on tool-description.md
@ghost ghost merged commit 8f2ce00 into common-workflow-language:draft-1 Dec 24, 2014
mr-c added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2016
Setup very basic linting and CI through Travis.
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant