Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

☑️ Undraft the bylaws: preface, purpose, amendments [due: 26 Apr] #143

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 26, 2024

Conversation

ebullient
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

@ebullient ebullient commented Apr 19, 2024

🗳️ Vote progress

It's time to finalize the bylaws! 🎉

To avoid drowning, we'll do these a few at a time, and I'll try to balance reading length.
If you haven't read them in depth, now would be a good time to give them a once over.

We're starting with a few easy ones:

  • The preface was added by request to give an overview of all of the parts
  • The purpose aligns the Commonhaus Foundation with its status as a 501(c)(6)
  • Amendments describes how we will approach amending these bylaws in the future.

What to do:

  • If you like it or it looks good to you:
    • Approve the PR
    • 👍 (:+1:) if it looks good to you
    • 👀 (:eyes:) if you're "ok" with it (it may not be your favorite)
  • If you think it needs discussion or revision
    • Create a review, add your comments and require changes
    • Use the +- button to make a suggestion (instead of just adding a comment).

voting group: @commonhaus/cf-egc

@ebullient ebullient requested a review from a team as a code owner April 19, 2024 23:52
@haus-rules-bot haus-rules-bot bot added the notice Notice (review, announcement) label Apr 19, 2024
@ebullient ebullient added the vote/open Vote open label Apr 24, 2024
Copy link

haus-rules-bot bot commented Apr 24, 2024

✅ 9 of 9 members of @commonhaus/cf-egc have voted (reaction or review).

Reaction Total Team Voting members
approve 10 9 aalmiray, cealsair, cowtowncoder, ebullient, evanchooly, gavinking, kenfinnigan, maxandersen, timtebeek

@maxandersen maxandersen self-requested a review April 25, 2024 05:38
Copy link
Contributor

@maxandersen maxandersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

started reading other parts finding TBD's when i realized it was just 0,1 and 8 - and for those: +1 :)

Copy link
Contributor

@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM :)

Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

@gavinking gavinking left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With the clarification to approval vote requirement that Erin just pushed, this now looks good.

@haus-rules-bot haus-rules-bot bot added the vote/quorum Vote has quorum of electronic responses label Apr 26, 2024
@ebullient ebullient merged commit 17cc1e9 into main Apr 26, 2024
4 checks passed
@ebullient ebullient deleted the undraft branch April 26, 2024 14:23
@ebullient ebullient added vote/done Vote closed and removed vote/open Vote open labels Apr 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
notice Notice (review, announcement) vote/done Vote closed vote/quorum Vote has quorum of electronic responses
Projects
None yet
10 participants