New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added Comments for CppInterOp's Doxygen based documentation #85
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here are some comments from my partial review. Perhaps we could use Check
instead of Identify
.
@sudo-panda, can you go through the documentation and check if it is aligned with the implementation?
…ation - Added Comments (Function Definitions) for CppInterOp Doxygen documentation - Incorporated minor changes in Interop.cpp and InterOp.h, as suggested in Vassil's review - changes to preamble section reverted - the "this pointer" term reverted - Made sentence openings consistent (e.g., Identifies > Checks) - Executed `git-clang-format` in InterOp.cpp and InterOp.h
Squashed last 10 commits and summarized all comments into the last force-push commit, no new changes to the files |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
I have added function definitions as Doxygen-style comments, based on the CppInterop information session between Baidyanath and Krishna.
Please review if my understanding was correct in these definitions (since I'm new to the domain).
Requested Reviewers: @vgvassilev @sudo-panda