Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

De novo database matching fails #12

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Aug 21, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

De novo database matching fails #12

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Aug 21, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Database mapping of de novo results
2.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Matches between fasta file and de novo results.  No amino acid sequence longer 
than 3 was found for tag W.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
1.1.12

Please provide any additional information below.

none

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Hadley....@gmail.com on 11 Feb 2015 at 12:30

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Hi and sorry for the inconvenience,

It seems that one of the de novo algorithms returned the sequence "W" which is 
obviously not very discriminative and crashed our database mapping algorithm. 
Would it be possible for you to make the output files available to us for 
testing?

Best regards,

Marc

Original comment by mvau...@gmail.com on 14 Feb 2015 at 1:02

  • Changed state: Accepted

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by harald.b...@gmail.com on 6 Mar 2015 at 11:46

@hbarsnes
Copy link
Member

As we didn't hear back from the user reporting the issue, we assume that either the issues has been solved in a more recent version of DeNovoGUI or that another workaround has been found. If this is not the case, please let us know and we'll reopen the issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants