Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Suggested text change #113

Closed
Jacco-V opened this issue Jun 5, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

Suggested text change #113

Jacco-V opened this issue Jun 5, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@Jacco-V
Copy link

Jacco-V commented Jun 5, 2017 •
edited

On the page: https://getcomposer.org/doc/articles/handling-private-packages-with-satis.md#security, under the heading Security, the second example is described as (emphasis mine):

Example using HTTP over SSL using a client certificate

I think it would be much clearer to the general public if HTTP over SSL was replaced by SSL/TLS (HTTPS):

Example using SSL/TLS (HTTPS) with a client certificate
svenmuennich pushed a commit to svenmuennich/composer that referenced this issue Jul 3, 2017
@Seldaek @svenmuennich
Minor wording tweak
015818c 
Closes composer/getcomposer.org#113
amyluo pushed a commit to amyluo/composer-doc that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2019
@Seldaek
Minor wording tweak
ff25812 
Closes composer/getcomposer.org#113
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Jacco-V