Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support for Mercurial and Bitbucket #54

Closed
shabbyrobe opened this issue Nov 3, 2011 · 4 comments
Closed

Support for Mercurial and Bitbucket #54

shabbyrobe opened this issue Nov 3, 2011 · 4 comments

Comments

@shabbyrobe
Copy link

Hello, I have a personal preference for Mercurial over Git (please, let's not make the discussion about this). It would be awesome to be able to hook packagist up to my existing Bitbucket mercurial repositories, or to Mercurial repositories on my own server - I would prefer not to have to move everything to github.
@igorw
Copy link
Contributor

igorw commented Nov 3, 2011

@dsp said something about hg support. He may work on it.

@Seldaek
Copy link
Member

Seldaek commented Nov 3, 2011

Yes, I have to finish refactoring some stuff in the repository handling, then we should have an good abstract base upon which you can add other Vcs relatively easily. And indeed @dsp will probably take care of Hg.

@Seldaek
Copy link
Member

Seldaek commented Nov 11, 2011

This will be fixed once I do #37, hopefully this weekend.

@Seldaek
Copy link
Member

Seldaek commented Nov 28, 2011

Fixed in 8042857 - please test it and confirm, Hg should be installed on the server but I am no Hg user so it may be that stuff is not working.

@Seldaek Seldaek closed this as completed Nov 28, 2011
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@igorw @Seldaek @shabbyrobe