windows doesn't have "ls" on the path so make a test for windows that…

[martintc]

… tests for a command in the path

I'm submitting a

• bug fix
• feature
• documentation addition

What is the current behaviour?

it_returns_true_when_found test fails

If the current behavior is a bug, please provide the steps to reproduce and if possible a minimal demo of the problem

What is the expected behavior?

The test passes

What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?

All tests should pass. The current tests looks for "ls" which isn't on window's path as an executable. This create a conditional compilation for the test such that the test that looks for "ls" is used on unix/unixy systems and there is a similar test compile for windows.

Please tell us about your environment:

Version (comtrya --version): 0.8.0
Operating system: Windows 11

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 46.64% // Head: 46.64% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (2badaf8) compared to base (7e6eace).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #291   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   46.64%   46.64%           
=======================================
  Files          79       79           
  Lines        2742     2742           
=======================================
  Hits         1279     1279           
  Misses       1463     1463           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
lib/src/steps/initializers/command_found.rs	100.00% <ø> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.