You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some libraries, like boost, could have or have an option to create a package with only "header_only" we currently don't have a mechanism to take into account that option to generate the binary package corresponding to the header_only option.
Should we?
Could it be confusing?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
and spdlog 1.4.0 got a header-only option, but library-per-default as well
We could give the header_only option a similar standardized special role as shared, i.e. tooling does react on this option accordingly and does add an extra build for header-only
danimtb
changed the title
Header only option?
[service] Header only option?
Oct 10, 2019
Some libraries, like boost, could have or have an option to create a package with only "header_only" we currently don't have a mechanism to take into account that option to generate the binary package corresponding to the
header_only
option.Should we?
Could it be confusing?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: