Object Naming Norms for Picture Stimuli (Snodgrass & Vanderwart, 1980)

[alzkuc]

Citation: Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174–215. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174]

A standardized set of 260 pictures, black and white.

• Pictures accessible via Appendix A, p. 197-204
• Concepts and Ranks in Appendix B, p. 205-210

PDF accesible via: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174

Important: APA does not own the distribution rights to the 260 picture stimuli in Appendix A.

[LinguList]

Thanks, I gave you access to also add labels to the issues now. We should start by typing off the data into a spreadsheet. What you can also test, @alzkuc, is to use Transkribus for this task, since preprocessing may be facilitated. If you want to, let me know, so we tell you how to access it.

[LinguList]

I suggest to start from page 205, since we have a clear table there. With Transkribus, rating results can also be added. But one should check what they mean there.

[LinguList]

The images itself could be annotated with polygons when converting the image to a scan. But I would probably not do so directly now, until we know if we can every share the images (part can be reused, I guess, but probably not entirely).

If you check semantic scholar, you see how many people have build on this, it is a huge topic.

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-standardized-set-of-260-pictures%3A-norms-for-name-Snodgrass-Vanderwart/144adacded5ed56c35a5f157fe231a0459620ec8