ENH add extra sysroot deps to mark builds

[beckermr]

Checklist

• Used a fork of the feedstock to propose changes
• Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
• Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
• Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
• Ensured the license file is being packaged.

This PR adds a few extra sysroot deps to mark the builds for the C/C++/FORTRAN compilers as belonging to the new sysroots. This enables us to use a repodata patch for the vendored sysroot versions of these compilers (conda-forge/conda-forge-repodata-patches-feedstock#66).

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipe:

• The home item is expected in the about section.
• The license item is expected in the about section.
• The summary item is expected in the about section.
• The outputs section contained an unexpected subsection name. target is not a valid subsection name.
• The outputs section contained an unexpected subsection name. target is not a valid subsection name.
• The outputs section contained an unexpected subsection name. target is not a valid subsection name.
• The outputs section contained an unexpected subsection name. target is not a valid subsection name.

[beckermr]

@conda-forge-admin rerender

[beckermr]

ok @isuruf @conda-forge/core this is the last PR we need to enable cos7!

[isuruf]

Shouldn't the activation packages also need a conflict with sysroot_*? Otherwise the old activation packages will be used with this new package.

[beckermr]

Shouldn't the activation packages also need a conflict with sysroot_*? Otherwise the old activation packages will be used with this new package.

Why do the activation packages care about the sysroot stuff?

[isuruf]

https://github.com/conda-forge/ctng-compiler-activation-feedstock/blob/master/recipe/activate-gcc.sh#L149

[beckermr]

@#!$@#!$@#!

How did I not know about this?!

UGH. Will make a PR and send repodata patches today. :/

[beckermr]

OK. I have the PR for the depo data patches here: conda-forge/conda-forge-repodata-patches-feedstock#68

We'll have to merge this PR after the repo data patches. We need it to make the pr on the activation scripts.

[beckermr]

Ok @isuruf, I think this one is ready to merge!

[jaimergp]

I think this PR is breaking gfortran tests for CMake 3.17. See logs for conda-forge/ambertools-feedstock#41.

[beckermr]

fixed in #33