Add windows build

[zklaus]

Checklist

• Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
• Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
• Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
• Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
• Ensured the license file is being packaged.

Add a windows build (closes #64)

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe:

• License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

[zklaus]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[zklaus]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[zklaus]

Needs windows build of netcdf-fortran, see conda-forge/netcdf-fortran-feedstock#3, conda-forge/netcdf-fortran-feedstock#52, conda-forge/netcdf-fortran-feedstock#60.

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[zklaus]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[zklaus]

Still blocked by conda-forge/netcdf-fortran-feedstock#3, conda-forge/netcdf-fortran-feedstock#52, conda-forge/netcdf-fortran-feedstock#60.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[zklaus]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[zklaus]

@conda-forge-admin, please restart ci

[zklaus]

@conda-forge-admin, please restart ci

[zklaus]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[zklaus]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[xylar]

Wow, @zklaus, amazing work! I looked through the patches and they look fine to me at a glance, though I don't feel qualified to assess them in detail. It's good enough for me that testing works.

[xylar]

@ocefpaf and @rokuingh, do you want to review or show @zklaus merge this?

[ocefpaf]

@zklaus as @xylar already said, this is amazing! What an herculean effort! I'd love if @rokuingh could look at the patches and, if possible, upstream them. However, I'm OK merging this as-is b/c if you are the main user of this package you'll know pretty soon if it is OK or not.

PS: I'm stealing the honor of merging this now but I'll definitely buy you and @xylar a 🍺 and/or ☕ if we manage to meet in person.

[zklaus]

Cheers, guys! Very happy to see this come along.

Re upstreaming, I have the patches in a branch against upstream at https://github.com/zklaus/esmf/tree/develop-windows. The commits should be largely orthogonal, i.e. easy to cherry-pick. I'll try to do PRs myself, but won't be mad at all if someone else gets to it first ;)

Re meeting in person, that's a great idea! You wouldn't happen to be in Vienna in late April?

[ocefpaf]

Re upstreaming, I have the patches in a branch against upstream at https://github.com/zklaus/esmf/tree/develop-windows. The commits should be largely orthogonal, i.e. easy to cherry-pick. I'll try to do PRs myself, but won't be mad at all if someone else gets to it first ;)

Awesome! I can try to send them if you are too busy.

Re meeting in person, that's a great idea! You wouldn't happen to be in Vienna in late April?

I no longer have an excuse to go to Vienna (EGU) b/c I'm not doing science anymore but I hope to be back. I'll keep you posted if I land there. If you are coming to SciPy in the USA please let me know.