Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add recipe/conda_build_config.yaml to use vs2017 #46

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

eriknw
Copy link
Contributor

@eriknw eriknw commented Oct 18, 2022

Checklist

  • Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
  • Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
  • [ ] Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
  • Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
  • Ensured the license file is being packaged.

I think recipe/conda_build_config.yaml is the correct way to specify which compiler to use:
https://conda-forge.org/docs/maintainer/knowledge_base.html#using-vs2019

@conda-forge-linter
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@eriknw
Copy link
Contributor Author

eriknw commented Oct 18, 2022

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you, but it looks like there was nothing to do.

This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/graphblas-feedstock/actions/runs/3275960735.

@eriknw
Copy link
Contributor Author

eriknw commented Oct 18, 2022

This is a followup to #45, where I manually forced vs2017. This PR adds a config file so rerender should be correct and use vs2017 instead of updating to vs2019.

@eriknw eriknw mentioned this pull request Oct 18, 2022
1 task
@eriknw eriknw closed this Oct 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants